Our Mission and Approach
The Case for Change
Mental health frameworks continue to prioritise pathology and symptom reduction over agency, stability and social wellbeing. Outcome measurement is inconsistent and rarely grounded in survivor-defined priorities. Without shared, credible measures of wellbeing, services cannot be designed effectively, commissioners cannot invest strategically, and impact cannot be assessed meaningfully.
Although lived experience is increasingly referenced in policy and research, survivor leadership is not yet embedded in governance, funding decisions or system design. Participation is too often consultative rather than structural. This limits accountability and constrains innovation.
Incremental adjustments are insufficient. What is required is coordinated, survivor-informed systems reform grounded in rigorous evidence, ethical leadership and sustained cross-sector collaboration.
Our Model for Change
Advancing survivor-defined wellbeing
Developing shared, strengths-based outcome frameworks to guide research, commissioning and services.
Learn moreEmbedding survivor leadership
Ensuring survivors shape research, governance and strategy as leaders.
Learn moreStrengthening services and evaluation
Supporting frontline organisations to evaluate, improve and scale survivor-centred interventions.
Learn moreInfluencing policy and systems
Translating evidence into tools, briefings and strategic engagement with key stakeholders.
Learn moreOur Strategic Priorities (2026-2029)
Build National Evaluation Infrastructure
Scale the VAMHN Evaluation Lab to provide accessible, ethical and methodologically robust evaluation support across the sector.
Set the Standard for Survivor-Defined Wellbeing
Develop and embed shared outcome frameworks that shape research, commissioning and frontline practice.
Institutionalise Survivor Leadership
Move from consultative engagement to structurally embedded governance, co-production and sector-wide ethical standards.
Drive Policy and Funding Reform
Translate rigorous, survivor-informed evidence into commissioning models and funding decisions that prioritise long-term recovery.
How We Work
- Rigorous and transparent research methods
- Ethical, supported survivor leadership
- Cross-sector collaboration
- Long-term systems focus over crisis response